Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c314d/c314d2c6f04eb74f51742cc8138c045fa69b2057" alt=""
Uncle Boonmee is dying of kidney failure. He is spending his last days with sister-in-law Jen, her son and his carer, on his tamarind and honey farm in the country. On the first evening, the ghost of his long-dead wife appears, as does that of his son, missing presumed dead in the jungle, now transformed into a Monkey Ghost. More Monkey Ghosts haunt the forest, lurking black silhouettes with pinpoint laser red eyes. The dead wife ghost sticks around to help drain Boonmee's kidney. An episode of costume drama intrudes, that may or may not be Boonmee recalling a past life in which he may or may not be the ugly princess, or the talking catfish who procreates with her in a shady pool. The family treks through the jungle to a cave of which Boonmee dreamt, in which he can recall being born in another life. By the end, the film has literally splintered into alternate realities. It is a perception-challenging dream-film, wherein reality is an extremely subjective term - indeed, it skirts dangerously close to meaninglessness - but which instead of demanding that the audience figure out some sort of coded meaning, encourages them to imagine multiple meanings based less on intellect and logic than on instinct and imagination.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc000/fc0007669d3570b2d239a6c988a40e22c42f049b" alt=""
The film succeeds because it exudes an unshakable belief in life as a continuum, via the transmigration and reincarnation of souls. In fact, Weerasethakul says he came to question this belief as he was making the film, which is perhaps why the ending feels rather forlorn. But by that time we are out of the jungle and it feels almost like an epilogue; the meat of the film has a mysterious wholeness to it that seems beyond the conventional notions of time and space, a specifically Buddhist worldview wherein humans, animals and nature are all intimately connected in ways too fundamental fully to understand. The film's crux moment comes when Boonmee says in the cave that he doesn't know if his eyes are open or shut; Weerasethakul's aim is to make the audience feel the same way, in the dark, in a dream or hypnosis state, unable to distinguish between the shadows on the wall of the cave, and the real life that is casting them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94301/9430134964e9fe8c5ea7361e75a51dfeb8c73379" alt=""
Not getting it is OK, and is in fact a deliberately invited response. The wonderfully atmospheric, crepuscular world is one dripping with mystery and collapsed time. The director's statement is all too true: that film-making remains a means of expression whose most intricate workings have yet to be fully understood, in exactly the same way as the inner workings of the mind remain mysterious. Knowledge - and wonder - will only increase if there are film-makers like Weerasethakul who strive to capture on film those elements of life as we know it and life as we imagine it, that we do not even fully understand ourselves. Anything that seeks seriously to find an alternative metaphor for human existence/experience/perception to that of Plato's cave is alright by me.
d/sc Apitchatpong Weerasethakul p Apitchatpong Weerasethaku, Simon Field, Keith Griffiths ph Yukontorn Mingmongkon, Sayombhu Mukdeeprom ed Lee Chatametikool pd Akekarat Homlaor cast Thanapat Saisaymar, Jenjira Pongpas, Sakda Kaewbuadee
(2010, Thai, 114m)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2565d/2565dd2f53e29e4e869efab95f6224cc37e2019e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45951/459517fc402e22ca5929fc46615945aaf4f59e71" alt=""
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home