Saturday, December 13, 2008

Bluebeard's Eighth Wife

This delicious comedy, coming at the tail-end of the screwball era, opens with one of the best ‘meeting-cute’ scenes ever. Gary Cooper - commanding, to the point, and somewhat impatient - wants to buy a pajama jacket without the pants, but the old-world French Riviera department store is thrown into confusion by such a radical suggestion; charming little Claudette Colbert chimes in that she is looking for a pair of pajama bottoms on their own. Now if only they can agree on the colour and pattern..

Needless to say they fall for each other on the spot, but Cooper, as millionaire financier Michael Brandon, makes a poor impression with his blunt, no-nonsense approach. Colbert is Nicole de Loiselle, from a family of down-at heel European aristos, and following some stolid wooing and some business with Louis XIV’s bath-tub which Brandon buys from her fly-by-night father their engagement is announced. Only then does Nicole discover that Brandon believes so much in marriage that he’s done it seven times before. As if that weren’t enough, his standard pre-nup agreement gets her father all excited and she feels even more like a bathtub to be traded. So she doubles his rate, hardens her heart and resolves to teach him a lesson.

The script was the first of many successful collaborations between Billy Wilder and Charles Brackett (Ball of Fire, Ninotchka, Sunset Boulevard) and is full of fantastic one-liners (”I only have to look at your pants to know everything”). It’s not as cruel as some of their later stuff, and Wilder’s in particular, but certainly relishes the cold shoulder Colbert gives Coop as she makes them live separate lives in their New York apartment She waits him out for a divorce, while he stands stubbornly for her stripping him of his pride and self-respect. For it is also an Ernst Lubitsch film, he of the famous comedy touch, and so the luxurious settings of old Europe and upper-crust New York, replete with marvelous hotels, gowns and jewels and an amusing roster of shop stewards and hotel staff, are all whipped up together with the cold-hearted battle of the sexes business to create the sort of perfectly-paced, sophisticated, elegant comedy for which Lubitsch was known, in which, for all their cheerful amorality, nothing is allowed to detract from the charmingly feather-light tone.

Some have remarked that this tone, this touch, has something reminiscent of the supremely well-mannered decadence of aristocratic fin-de-siècle central Europe. Lubitsch was German (and Wilder was Austrian) and in a not-entirely offhand way the battle here is not only between the sexes, but between Europe and America also. From the second shot (of the department store window, where ‘English is spoken’ and ‘American is understood’) we know the latter is going to get something of a raw deal. Brandon’s brusque man of dynamism makes snap decisions, follows his hunches, demands action and forges straight ahead, the epitome of the archetypal post-depression American businessman: for whom books are for falling asleep to, love-making is a time-wasting overture to marriage and the Marquis de Loiselle is, naturally, Mr “Loyzelee”. Nicole, on the other hand, is exquisitely French, whimsical, romantic and utterly charming. When she praises him, however, for his “charm and finesse”, Cooper’s sly enough not to let us know whether the sarcasm is going over his head or if he’s just letting it slide. No-one could have conveyed the authority and bearing of the successful “big” man, brusque, brash and bullish, yet remained so constantly endearing as Cooper; it could have seemed like poking fun on paper, but only Coop could make it so appealing boyish when he asks his financial partner over the phone about the end of that week’s Flash Gordon strip. He is always at his best when playing men of simple directness, although they usually have more downhome wisdom than this. It’s partly his lack of understanding of the world, of other people, that has him so grumpy all the time - very much along the lines of the classic uncomprehending father in countless screwball comedies. Cooper’s always funny when he plays grumpy, partly because you know he won’t be for too long (it’s only serious when he has righteous anger), and rather than mean-spiritedness, his impatience is that of a dynamic and successful man with some justification for feeling as though he is surrounded by idiots; among the film’s great pleasures are his frequent outbursts of “it’s an outrage” and the like, but the boyish glint is never far from his eye nor the smile from his lips.

In basically the role of the dupe, Coop does a great job of standing up to Claudette Colbert, who is just perfect. Nobody else in pictures achieved such radiant beauty and elegance whilst retaining such sweetness (with a hint of mischief): this despite repeatedly daring ridiculously large collars ruffs, yet wearing them more like pierrot than a common clown, and sporting some of the most outrageous eye-brow/shadow design ever to be seen onscreen (in the era of Joan Crawford and Marlene Dietrich, no less). In contrast to the straight-ahead American/man of the head, who’s mind can only run on one track at a time, she’s the playful, emotional European/woman of the heart. With her sponging family set-up, however, she can assure him quite honestly that she too is interested in finance; when baited she shows she can do business in her own, roundabout way, with little enough cunning to best the stiff-backed, unimaginative Brandon at his own game (marriage as investment). With her impeccable manners and composure and a very sly sexiness, Colbert could give her leading men all the trouble she liked.

Talent, script and direction are all wonderful, and the film is fleshed out with a mischievous score that ably carries some of the comic weight, and a super supporting cast, from David Niven’s amiable nitwit of a bank clerk to formidable Aunt Hedwige in a bath-chair. With perfect taste, Lubitsh takes things to the brink of bedroom farce (complete with a straw-hatted prize-fighter) without becoming ridiculous, and it surely can’t have been the first film to try, but there’s even a perfectly-presented Taming of the Shrew gag. Best of all is a delightfully extended scene where Coop tries some tricks of his own to get Colbert to unfreeze, including plenty of champagne and salty caviar (regaling her at the piano with “Lookie lookie here comes Cookie” he manages his trick of being hokey, ridiculous and charming all at once, whilst she plays wonderfully drunk and at one point almost audibly melts with pleasure). If the ending feels a little harsh - manhood is comprehensively defeated as the film contrives Cooper into a straitjacket - we know by now we’re not to take it too seriously and besides, Colbert is so delightful that no-one would dream of begrudging her such a charmingly-won victory for womanhood and romance.

d/p Ernst Lubitsch sc Billy Wilder, Charles Brackett ph Leo Tover ad Hans Dreier, Robert Usher m Werner R. Heymann, Friedrich Hollaender cast Claudette Colbert, Gary Cooper, Edward Everett Horton, David Niven, Elizabeth Patterson, Herman Bing
(1938, USA, 85m, b/w)
posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Sunday, November 30, 2008

L'Atalante

L'Atalante is simply one of the most poetically beautiful films there is. It’s a love story of desire and longing and the foolish impediments that lovers put in their own paths. Imbued with the same wonderfully and specifically French feel as the films of Gance and Renoir, it exhibits a similar mastery of the magical powers of cinema to communicate in what feels like pure emotion. The film’s aura is only enhanced by the fact that it was the sole feature by Jean Vigo, suffering from TB and dying tragically at age 29 weeks after the end of shooting (he didn’t make the final cut).

The title is the name of a barge, skippered by Jean (Jean Dasté), with an odd, bearish first mate, père Jules (Michel Simon). The film tells the simple tale of Jean’s honeymoon with wife Juliette (Dita Parlo) on the rivers up to the coast. She finds life on the barge uncomfortable and is lured by the attractions of the shore and the bright lights of the city; he is often unaware of her dissatisfaction, or reacts with a short temper in impotent incomprehension; yet at other times they while away hours of such happiness as only fresh love knows.

The story flows as serenely as the river, whilst Vigo raises the everyday tale of everyday folk to repeated emotional heights. A strong motif is that of the lovers’ losing one another, as they do on the first night on the barge, in the fog, prompting an exhilarating reunion; later, Juliette teaches Jean a neat trick (which he cannot perform) for seeing one’s true love by ducking one’s head under water; and a night apart turns into a delirious visual sequence as the lovers toss and turn in separate beds, miles apart, but are brought (rather erotically) together by the strength of their desires and by the magic tricks of film-making.

And there are plenty of magical tricks of film-making, from deftness of editing and luminous cinematography to double exposures and fun with the diegetic soundtrack. The predominant performer of tricks onscreen is the eccentric père Jules, with his incomprehensible gabble and his tendency to do unexpected or outrageous things, such as larking about in a skirt, Greco-Roman wrestling with himself or getting his hair cut by the dog-clipper. He stands in striking counterpoint to stolid Jean and petulant Juliette as a source of unfettered emotion and good humour (most of the time; he’s also very amusing when grumpy). Jules’ cabin is the repository of most of his magic tricks, a wonderland of relics from his travels (it is also full of cats: always a good thing) and the wonders extend to the fantastic patchwork of sailor tattoos that covers his body - Juliette is spellbound in equal parts horror and fascination. It’s only natural that this free-spirited id figure should be instrumental in reuniting the lovers; each hurt and angry, then lost and desperate, they let petty all-too human failings get in the way of the fulfillment of the heart’s desire. A transportative sequence of lovesick reverie and their semi-magical reunion are so wonderful that one can believe that the happy ending will last forever (Léos Carax did, using an old couple on a barge called L’Atalante to pick up his own lovers from the Pont Neuf).

In addition to the bits of wonderful camera trickery, the actual visual texture of the film is gorgeous. It was variously shot by Louis Berger, Jean-Paul Alphen (La Règle du jeu) and, predominantly, by the Russian Boris Kaufman (of Man With A Movie Camera fame, something of a visual poet himself). It's full of radically striking sequences and shots, from the newlyweds’ long procession to the barge through increasingly abstracted landscapes at the start, via the strange looming images of the passing shore that prefigure Night of the Hunter, to the final, striking overhead shot. Poetic realism was a specialty of French cinema from Abel Gance onwards, and many of the wordless sequences hark back to the purely visual beauty achieved in the final years of the silent era. But the soundtrack plays its part too, from Maurice Jaubert’s jaunty (and marvellously catchy) theme song and score, to the points where soundtrack and diegetic sound merge (most amusingly in Jules’ cabin, most movingly at Juliette’s lowest point, lost in the city).

Vigo also made a great 45-minute film about riotous school kids (Zéro de counduite), a strange little short about a champion swimmer, and an avant-garde documentary (A propos de nice). It is in the glorious, yearning vision of L’Atalante, however, in complete command of the medium and managing to appear both fantastically modern and older than film itself, that Vigo proves himself indeed to be a tragically lost, one-off poet of the cinema.

d Jean Vigo p Jacques-Louis Nounez sc Jean Guinée, Albert Riéra, Jean Vigo ph Boris Kaufman, Louis Berger, Jean-Paul Alphen ad Francis Jourdain m Maurice Jaubert cast Jean Dasté, Dita Parlo, Michel Simon, Gilles Margaritis, Louis Lefebvre
(1934, Fr, 89m, b/w)
posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Bell, Book and Candle

An unlikely sequel, this repairs Jimmy Stewart and Kim Novak straight off Vertigo. The comparison does Quine’s slightly hip romantic comedy few favours, but even without the spectre of Hitchcock’s film, it would struggle to impress. Gently supernatural and feather-light, its most obvious precursor is I Married A Witch, but Quine is no sparkling Clair and to compare the slightly lumpen Novak to Veronica Lake seems unfair; she is not so poor an actress as some would have her, however, and her awkwardness on screen has an indefinable quality that here, as for Maddie/Judy, does produce an appropriately otherworldly effect. She is now a modern-day New York witch, and her dilemma is between the world of witchcraft and that of mere mortals. Stewart is the love interest, but looks to have aged about ten years since Vertigo and meanders through the film um-ing and ah-ing, happy to let the young people go about their business: any sense of a spark in the central relationship is pure intertextual frisson. The real appeal of the film is in the endearingly kooky turns from Lanchester and Kovacs; and, if one cares for that sort of thing, Jack Lemmon has his full schtick down pat (his next film was Some Like It Hot). Unfussily good-natured and undemanding, but singularly lacking in magic.

d Richard Quine p Julian Blaustein sc Daniel Taradash ph James Wong Howe ed Charles Nelson ad Cary Odell m George Duning cast James Stewart, Kim Novak, Jack Lemmon, Ernie Kovacs, Hermione Gingold, Elsa Lanchester, Janice Rule, Philippe Clay
(1958, USA, 106m)
posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Monday, April 7, 2008

La Roue (The Wheel)

Cocteau: “There is cinema before and after La Roue, just as there is painting before and after Picasso”. Four years before Napoléon, Gance's reputation as the finest director in France, or indeed anywhere, was assured with La Roue. It is a melodramatic tale, the story of a woman loved by three men, mistaken familial identity, and the trials of modern man barely able to control the power of the new machines he has created. Since Zola at least, the train was a symbol of massive and uncontrollable force, helpfully providing a physical equivalent to the unstoppable power of human emotion. It is this last strand – “la poésie des machines” – just as much as the love story(s), that is the source of the poetry, visual and metaphysical, along with Gance’s obviously deeply-felt involvement in the project: his wife was diagnosed with TB on the day he thought up the idea for the film, and she died hours before he completed the editing; the whole third act of the movie was set in the mountains in order to accommodate her vital need for alpine air; and close personal friend and lead Sévrin-Mars was suffering from a heart condition that would kill him two months later. It is Gance’s own curiously set (and unidentified) face that serves as backdrop in the opening sequence, a disorientating superimposed layer of locomotive wheels hurtling left and right, a visual manifestation of technological man’s state of mind, a premonition of the dominance this technology will exert on the characters’ bodies and souls, and a foreshadowing of the emotional confusion and chaotic destruction that will ensue immediately with the horrendous train smash that opens the film proper.

The high-pitched rhythm of the opening does not abate with this first scene, a frenticism rendered more through the total assurance of the rapid cutting than through actual movement onscreen, and as with the snowball fight in Napoléon, it opens the film with a bang. Norma, the Rose of the Railyard, is an infant orphaned by the destruction of the machines. Tragedy remains close at hand 15 years on, the smash-up now being on the rocks of unfettered human emotion. Her adoptive father, engine driver Sisif, and supposed brother, violin maker Elie, both worship her and when she marries her suitor, a dislikable clerk, they are distraight. Blinded by hot engine steam, Sisif exiles himself and his son to the alpine funiculaire. The rush towards modernity may produce its own casualties, but as the bergfilm-makers always knew, left to himself in the wildest and most hostile of barren nature, man is quite capable of creating his own (melo)drama. The smoke and fire of the railyard are far below and the alpine storms and expansive snowscapes throw the action into stark relief. As dark gives way to light, the resolutely modern context of the first half of the film is slightly missed, and the story is more clearly revealed as the age-old one of man, woman and thwarted love. Gance's assured and ever-imaginative technique compensates for the sentimentality of the endplay, his camera at one point even providing the startling subjective viewpoint of a blind man, and the delirious flashing before the eyes of a life too soon cut short.

Down in the valley, the authenticity is exquisite. Gance built his sets in the actual marshalling yards of Nice, a spectacular location with he needed for a hymn to the constant motion and rhythms of the wheels, coupling rods and pistons, whistles and steam, bang on the modernist nose an inspiration to the Russians in the montage game (it was studied by Eisenstein, Dovzhenko, Pudovkin et al at the Moscow Academy). Artists of the 1920s, across all media and national boundaries, were drawn to this new machine world, but the wheel of the title is as much that of fate as it is of the locomotive. Kipling tells us via an intertitle that all men are bound to this wheel, and for Hugo, in another, its inexorable forward motion will inevitably crush many of us in its path. There are other wheels too, some of them no less treacherous: the boiler door that traps the engineer Mâchefer; the malignantly grinning signal that malfunctions. Others provide frames or motifs: the constantly emphatic iris framing and the ever-present flywheel of the model in Sisif’s front room. The window of the mountain cabin to which father and son retreat in the second half is a circle broken by a cross; and the circle of revellers at the end turns and turns further up the mountain, individual will once again and finally suppressed by the movement of the whole, spinning inexorably and ever higher towards heaven. Norma’s husband, Hersan, points out that she herself is the hub of a wheel, with the three men constantly circling around her. This last circle makes explicit the contrast between pure idealism and the dirt of the modernist world. Norma is poeticised beyond her corporeal reality, an ideal for the three men that love her, her identity blurring with the impossible trace of floral beauty found between the tracks, the Rose of the Railyard. Elie idealises her as the standard-issue medieval maiden in his daydream, imagining himself a medieval luthier in a simpler and naively happier time of craft, intricacy, delicacy, beauty and art; his obssession with an another unobtainable ideal in the form of ancient musical instruments and the rediscovery of a mythical violin varnish contrasts with the mechanical power, bulk and force of the locomotive. Industrial man has left such a past lost behind him, and created an unbreakable bond with the machines of his age, in which Sisif can treat his locomotive as a friend and as his only confidante. Mâchefer becomes perfectly one with his machine when he gets stuck behind the boiler door, pulling the levers and bringing the engine to life as a grinning face appears on the door itself; and a man can be so much at one with his machine that he can drive his train or operate the signals even when almost entirely blind.

The eyes are the final circles of the film: the signalman cannot see, and the train crashes; Sisif loses his sight (due to the ever-treacherous machinery, of course), a one-eyed man takes notes in the rail yard, and the boiler door and junction signal sprout eyes of their own. And we watch as Gance films, and we see manifestations of human emotion made visible on screen. His camera consistently reaches beyond the dirty realism of the stockyard to essay flights of psychological fantasy, with superimpositions, negative shots, and fantastic editing, as master whose only equal amongst disciples in what remains to us of the silent era is Murnau at his most sublime. The latter's floating words of Faust are presaged by the letters of “Norma”, dividing father and son on either side of the screen; we hear vividly the locomotive’s whistle as Elie, the son, violently covers his ears à la Der Letzte Mann; and Norma’s superimposed visit to Elie anticipates the city girl’s visitation on the man in Sunrise (as well as of the mutually-dreamed reunion of the newlyweds in L’Atalante). The camera constantly reaches through the physical plane to an acute and impossible representation of the psychological state of the protagonist. Yet, Gance’s ultra-modern “poésie des machines” is perfectly interwoven in a kaleidoscope of imagery with the heady nineteenth-century emotionalism of melodrama. Cinema as pure poetry.

d Abel Gance p Abel Gance, Charles Pathé sc Abel Gance ph Gaston Brun ed Marguerite Beaugé, Abel Gance ad Robert Boudrioz m Arthur Honegger cast Séverin-Mars, Ivy Close, Gabriel de Gravone, Pierre Magnier, Max Maxudian, Georges Térof
(1923, Fr, 12 reels [c.273m], b/w)
posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Monday, March 31, 2008

La Mort en ce jardin (Death in the Garden/Evil Eden)

The eponymous garden is an inhospitable South American jungle into which stumbles an assorted group of escapees from a repressive military regime in a remote mining community. Much of the film is spent sketching this community (and political situation) and setting up the characters to sidestep our expectations when they are exposed in the wilderness, where they have a tough time of it before their salvation also proves their downfall as a group. Buñuel allows his characters the freedom of action that comes with complete amorality in a world where life is cheap, and although ostensibly an adventure film (Vanel and first-half setting recall La Salaire de la peur) it plods somewhat until the flight, and the Buñuelian fun only begins in the forest: a mute girl gets her long hair decorously entwined in the trees, a horde of ants reanimates a snake carcass, and the priest (a very young Michel Piccoli) tears pages from his bible, presumably as toilet paper.

d Luis Buñuel p Óscar Dancigers sc Luis Alcoriza, Gabriel Arout, Luis Buñuel, Raymond Queneau ph Jorge Stahl Jr ed Denise Charvein, Marguerite Renoir pd Edward Fitzgerald m Paul Misraki cast Simone Signoret, Charles Vanel, Georges Marchal, Michel Piccoli, Tito Junco, Raúl Ramirez, Michèle Girardon, Jorge Martínez de Hoyos
(1956, Mex, 104m)
posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Up!

Auteur par excellence, Russ Meyer was not only a first-rate cameraman (he filmed for the army in WWII) and a remarkably deft editor but, whilst aiming always to entertain, he spent a lifetime exploring an obsessive personal vision in films about strong women. And it so happens that these women all have improbably large breasts, usually bare; in ridiculous paper-thin backwoods plots they are subjected to violence and rape by macho men, though they always fight back, and watch out the weakling! His penultimate feature is a cornucopia of Meyerist lunacy, with more blood and nudity than ever before, fantastically elongated prosthetic penises (in teasing glimpses), the magnificent Raven de la Croix doing her best Mae West impersonation, and a piranha-in-the-bathtub murder (the victim: a distinctively mustachioed Adolf "Schwarz"). Will the villain be Eva Braun Jr? Or perhaps hulking, axe-wielding backwards backwoodsman Rafe? What about sleazy Leonard Box? The action is frequently interrupted by joyous scenes of idyllic rural love-making, and regular recaps from the irrepressible Kitten Natividad as a leather-booted Greek chorus, the perfect hostess for such mythologically fetishistic excess. With a frolicsome pace, a consistently witty script from none other than Roger Ebert, a sense that Meyer has perfected his form, and just plain good film-making, it’s a masterpiece, of sorts.

d/p/ph/ed Russ Meyer sc Russ Meyer, Roger Ebert ad Michael Levesque m William Loose, Paul Ruhland cast Raven de la Croix, Janet Wood, Robert McLane, Larry Dean, Monty Bane, Bob Schott, Kitten Natividad, Linda Sue Ragsdale, Edward Schaaf, Mary Gavin, Marianne Marks
(1976,
USA
, 80m)

posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Phffft!

An early entry in the ’50s cycle of American movies, all seemingly set in New York, written by Axelrod, and channeling the anxiety of the film industry through professional men at sea in a world of self-sufficient women and young people speaking an incomprehensibly hip new language; a couple of years later Lemmon and buddy Carlson would be on Madison Avenue but for now they are tax lawyer and (irrelevantly) playwright. Arbitrarily, Robert and Nina get divorced, but he finds himself too timid to play the field, even with so eager a partner as Novak; his wife is ready to give singledom a go, but the men always blow it. Lemmon plays his regular unsympathetically dithering schtick and the result would be dated dross were it not for Judy Holliday, even given far too little to do, smart and scatterbrained, riveting and wonderfulher mambo is out of this world, and only she could make tax-time cute.

d Mark Robson p Fred Kohlmar sc George Axelrod ph Charles Lang ed Charles Nelson ad William Flannery m Frederick Hollander cast Jack Lemmon, Judy Holliday, Jack Carson, Kim Novak, Luella Greer, Donald Randolph, Donald Curtis
(1954, USA, 88m, b/w)
posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Monday, March 3, 2008

Rio das Mortes

Michael and Günther are two young men without prospects, the former a tile-layer, and the latter just out of the navy (which despite their mutual vow to evade national service he joined to be a “good German”, he says with a mocking laugh. He’s black). They have an old hand-drawn map of the Rio das Mortes region of Peru, indicating buried treasure, and the film focuses on their attempts to raise money for the expedition. Unfortunately, despite selling a car and having Günther move in to save rent, they are not very good at it, perhaps because as members of the working class, they were never taught how – the mantra of Michel’s schoolteacher girlfriend is that children must be inculcated to succeed in society. They try to raise money from an investor, claiming to be planning a cotton farm, but with no sense of the realities involved, and they fail miserably to get funding from an academic body when they plan to take along a student acquaintance. Although, as Michel says, “you can never get what you want”, it is no surprise in their case as they are entirely unequipped to deal with the economic realities they face, as perfectly represented by the fact that although their reasons for going on the trip are “for life, for freedom”, their dream also based on escaping into fantasy from their workaday existence and discovering buried treasure (a further irony being that the Rio das Mortes region is in Brazil, not Peru).

While the boys are running around trying to raise money, Hanna Schygulla watches unamused as Michel’s girlfriend. It is she who is the real star, opening the film casual in lingerie, and thereafter in a succession of smart outfits and hats. She thinks their idea is stupid, and besides she wants to get married (although this may well be more for social form than anything else, as her mother badgers her over the telephone, and she reacts with irritation to the landlady’s calling her “frau”). There’s something fatal to the film about the disjunction between her character and its presentation, and the activities of the boys; although she too has a same-sex friend, another teacher, their joint educational aspirations are not given enough emphasis (treated as a childish joke in one scene that turns the USSR into a phallus) to balance those of the boys (who even wrestle like hawksian/fordian/walshian buddies), and as great as she looks, she’s too Hollywood-overdressed for the movie; by the end she is literally dressed to kill, but exchanges her revolver for a lipstick, twin signifiers if ever there were, of Fassbinder’s American cinema. Based on an idea by Volker Schlondorff, the film feels tossed off, with the air of being casually formulated over a few drinks in the bar and never refined. The boys get a fairytale ending as a random patroness stumps up the cash; it would be a shameless deus ex machina – in Fassbinder’s fantasy the working class gets a well-deserved break – were it not for the fact that Fassbinder himself had received the funding for his first feature the previous year in almost exactly the same way, from eccentric patroness Hanna Axmann-Rezzori, here playing herself. Nonetheless, the meandering feel gives it an enjoyable lightness and the stylistic disjunctions – if not the over-used zoom – can be borne with for the presence of the always-captivating Schygulla. And the best scene of all has no relation to the plot whatsoever, as Schygulla, in a sizzling red and lace dress dances up a storm to “Jailhouse Rock” on the jukebox in the company of an oafish leather-jacketed youth, Fassbinder himself.

d/p/sc Rainer Werner Fassbinder ph Dietrich Lohmann ed Thea Eymèsz pd Kurt Raab m Peer Raben cast Michael König, Günther Kaufmann, Hanna Schygulla, Katrin Schaake, Harry Baer, Ulli Lommel, Marius Aicher, Walter Sedlmayr, Franz Maron, Hanna Axmann-Rezzori
(1971, WGer[TV], 84m)

posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

The Undefeated

Entirely undemanding, rather bloated, and not so much politically suspect as drowning in soft soap, another turgid effort from McLaglen is just about kept afloat by the old-hand professionalism of Wayne and Hudson. The latter is nonetheless ill-at-ease as the stiff-backed southern colonel/patriarch leading his people to Mexico at the end of the civil war, but Wayne is in his comfortable late 60’s mode (having just won the Oscar for True Grit) and takes in his stride the Yankee ex-Colonel driving 3000 steers south to sell to the Mexican government. Some play is made of the conflict between patriotism and private enterprise, and reconciliation between North and South, but in too superficial a manner even to be offensive in its simple-mindedness; old lags Dano, Johnson et al are roped in for a sheen of authenticity, but the direction strives typically for greatness, and a desperate-to-please score and simplistic script contribute to the overall soullessness.

d Andrew V. McLaglen p Robert L. Jacks sc James Lee Barrett ph William H. Clothier ed Robert L. Simpson ad Carl Anderson m Hugo Montenegro cast John Wayne, Rock Hudson, Roman Gabriel, Melissa Newman, Antonio Aguilar, Merian McCargo, Merlin Olsen, Ben Johnson, Dub Taylor, Bruce Cabot, Jan-Michael Vincent, Harry Carey Jr, Royal Dano, Edward Faulkner
(1969, USA, 119m)

posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Histoire de Marie et Julien

In 1976, Rivette had just started work with Leslie Caron and Albert Finney on the third of a proposed tetralogy of mystical films with female protagonists, inextricably linked in terms of theme and focus but separate entities in their own right. He had a breakdown two days into shooting, and the third and fourth installments were never made (and Duelle and Noroït are so hard to find with English subs that they are almost phantom films themselves). His return to the material in 2003 is by no means the film he had started 17 years before, but is at least a happy reminder of those mystical and harebrained days, with a mystery plot barely explained but consistently intriguing, strange otherworldy goings-on, and an indefinable aura of menace. Julien is blackmailing a woman, known only as Madame X, over some fake Chinese silks, a photograph and a small doll. He is also a restorer of clocks, and the large exposed wheels in his workshop fit together as mysteriously as the plot elements, their true function – and the fact that they do not run entirely smoothly – not revealed until the final (touching) ending. The literary eminence grise this time is Poe’s “The Raven” (clued by the name of the wide-eyed cat, Nevermore), but once again the primary concerns are the passage of time, and how men and women can live with one another, as Marie and Julien rekindle their relationship that (perhaps never really) started one year previously. A substantial and rewarding film but it could never match one’s imagined version of the original incarnation, not least as the stateliness that has crept into Rivette’s later work (with success, for the most part) is no replacement for his 1970’s joie de tourner.

d Jacques Rivette p Martine Marignac sc Pascal Bonitzer, Christine Laurent, Jacques Rivette ph William Lubtchansky ed Nicole Lubtchansky pd Manu de Chauvigny cast Emmanuelle Béart, Jerzy Radziwilowicz, Anne Brochet, Bettina Kee, Olivier Cruveiller, Mathias Jung, Nicole Garcia
(2003, Fr, 150m)
posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Le Scaphandre et le papillon (The Diving Bell and the Butterfly)

If ever there was a film crying out for a first-person camera, this is it. It probably wouldn't have worked for Welles’ Heart of Darkness and it didn’t in The Lady In The Lake, but the story of a man with locked-in syndrome, adapted from the book written while he was in that condition is so ically internalised, his eye (and ears) remaining his sole contact with the world, that it seems like a shoe-in. Which is why the first section (3 scenes? 15 minutes?) is so electrifying, as we wake up with Jean-Do Bauby, the camera at his point of view, pulling focus all over the place with the effective result that people and objects lurch haphazardly out of the fog of three weeks’ coma-sleep. There’s even the best inside-of-the-eyelid shot since A Matter of Life and Death. Almost entirely paralysed, he has only the three resources of his eye, his imagination and his memory. During this first section the camera also starts to takes us into these memories and steps back to show Bauby before his stroke, handsome and relaxed , with lightly-worn self assurance; we get an idea of what he looks like now from passing reflection; and we start to get to know him from his interior monologue. But when the camera finally steps out of his literal or mental point of view, in the present, it is to the film’s detriment. The result is effectively shocking, and we are suddenly forced to disassociate ourselves from his mind and our close identification to consider a drooling lop-sided face – later almost a caricature in hospital-issue spectacles, one lens fogged-out, and slightly ridiculous hat – and the inert, limp body with twisted arms. Close identification is retained through his voice on the soundtrack but, over time, as his body loses all importance for him, all relevance, its continued presence on screen draws much of the power from his point of view. The other characters, of course can see him only as this body (with one eye, desperately alive), their access to the living mind so painfully restricted, and when we are asked to share this external perspective the extremity between the two points of view, the disparity between the dead body and the fully alive mind, are things that the film never manages to accommodate. And the first switch from one to the other comes casually, for no particular reason, an almost impressionistic formal stroke. Far more successful and lyrical are the forays away from literal point of view into his imagination, where he floats suspended in a motionless diving suit (though where’s the diving bell? In the translation, it turns out - scaphandre means diving suit, although besides its idiomatic ring, the diving bell seems like a metaphor for much greater constriction) or sees a butterfly emerging from its chrysalis (his imagination). More opaquely, glaciers fall monumentally into an ocean; and he imagines even himself, in the present, stranded in his wheelchair on a marooned structure in an angry sea. It is a shame that none of the scenes taking place in the present reality shown from outside his point of view play as though he were imagining how they would look; the most effective glimpse of his imagination is as he loses himself in his darkened reflection and the camera seamlessly follows his movement from reality to fantasy as it steps out of his head to a non-identified perspective for just the right moment of movement.

Schnabel’s method of work was reputedly no rehearsal and few takes. This is a film which underwent planning and preparation, as any must, but which strives to maintain the spontaneity of a more-swiftly achieved art (painting, say), and that it works is testament to the actors, really put on the line. But the same lack of rigour in the film’s form places the whole burden on its lyrical, impressionistic characteristics, moments thrown into place like spontaneous splashes of colour. Many of them work beautifully, such as the opening sequence, the shots of Bauby isolated against the ocean, the stroke, when it comes, and at just the right moment, from his point of view; but such an approach is for Schnabel a test, very much, of his taste. And despite consistently superb photography, it sometimes feels a little second-hand, or prettified – chocolate-box. The shot of a woman’s long red-chestnut hair flying in the wind is mesmerizing, but not quite enough so for the length of time that it is held, and is naggingly reminiscent of an ipod advertisement; when the scene moves to a stock situation of lovers driving a convertible through a beautiful landscape and sunshine with U2 playing on the soundtrack, it is only saved from playing exactly like a commercial by the swift editing which finds a more natural rhythm than the pointed (pointing) staccato hits of much advertising media. Schnabel was inspired by a transcendent moment whilst driving to the same (typically dirge-like) U2 song but it is a shame that his inspiration is so commonplace. Perhaps, however, it is only appropriate for a character at the forefront of popular, fashionable, media, however esoteric others of his tastes may run.

One of the film’s saving graces is that it is nonetheless impossible to forget the extraordinariness of Bauby’s situation, the enormity of his achievement, even though we are given little sense of the incredible length of time it takes to dictate a book letter by letter using only an eye, little sense of the boredom and frustration that must at times have been all-consuming. We share so much with him that not to share the weight of time, even in passing, is another unhelpful distanciation, a prettifying elision. He’s bored on the quiet Sundays, and the empty halls and pool we see certainly look boring, but we take his word for it rather than fully understand. This is in keeping with our strange mixed relationship to/with him wherein it is surprising to hear him express extremes of emotion: death-wish depression, which passes in one brief scene (more about his nurse than him – this is a film that is determinedly unmorbid); or when his spirits are up, when otherwise they seem rather on an even keel, mildly annoyed at most. Nonetheless, our understanding of his condition and empathy with it are enough established that when others evince more pity for themselves than him (his lover weeps down the telephone, but at least his nurse apologizes) or claim common understanding of his plight, we know that they haven’t quite got it: his friend held hostage for four years comes close, and has empathetic advice, but X is not especially impressed; and Max von Sydow as his apartment-bound father has already shown himself in one of Bauby’s memories to be a magnificent narcissist. Ultimately, the film is a qualified success, largely because much of this empathy comes from Bauby’s beautifully lyrical and uncomplicated prose, of which we get a lot, and which approaches – often – a state of poetry. This emotional level of communication is what at times Schnabel too seems to be aiming for but he just too often fails to transcend the prosaic.

d Julian Scnabel p Kathleen Kennedy, John Kilik sc Ronald Harwood ph Janusz Kaminski ed Juliette Welfling ad Michael Eric, Laurent Ott m Paul Cantelon cast Mathieu Amalric, Marie Josée Croze, Anne Consigny, Emmanuelle Seigner, Max von Sydow, Patrick Chesnais, Niels Arestrup, Isaach de Bankolé, Marina Hands, Jean-Pierre Cassel
(2007, USA, 112m)

posted by tom newth at 2 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Mah Nakorn (Citizen Dog)

Thoroughly enjoyable, Citizen Dog tells the slight story of Pod, a country bumpkin and a romantic without a dream, newly arrived in Bangkok. His unusual adventures unfold in a series of titled vignettes, along with those of his unusual acquaintances. First we meet Jin, object of Pod’s tender affections, obsessed with cleaning and with a book with white covers in a language she cannot understand that fell at her feet from a spectacularly (digital) plummeting aeroplane. Yod is Pod’s best friend and “finger buddy” following an incident at the sardine cannery where they work, and others include Kong, the ghost motorcycle taxi driver, and Baby Mam, 22 years in the body of a 13 year old, with her constant (and constantly smoking) companion, the animate teddy bear Thomchong.

Although necessarily episodic, the whole is weaved together by a warm good humour, a terrific and almost constant music track, insanely vibrant colour schemes, and the wonderfully everyday surrealism that is the film’s beating heart, most touching in the mountain of plastic bottles that reaches to the moon, and most amusingly unsettling in the reincarnation of Pod’s grandmother as a gecko. The first half is uproarious, but the pace flags (Pod’s brief celebrity for being the only person in Bangkok without a tail falls resolutely flat). The natural inconsequentiality of the picaresque structure is reinforced by the ironic detachment of the bone-dry voiceover (by Pen-Ek Ratanaruang) and by the heightened non-realism of the alternate world of the film; but the former is amusing, the latter engagingly weird enough, and Pod so unfailingly good-natured, that charm, romanticism and sheer oddity win out.

d Wisit Sasanatieng p Aphiradee Iamphungporn, Charoen Iamphungporn, Kiatkamon Iamphungporn, Rewat Vorarat sc Wisit Sasanatieng ph Rewat Prelert ed Polarat Kitikunpairoj, Dusanee Puinongpho ad Suras Kardeeroj m Amornpong Methakunawut cast Mahasamut Boonyaruk, Saengthong Gate-Uthong, Sawatwong Palakawong Na Autthaya, Chuck Stephens, Raenkum Saninn
(2004, Thailand, 100m)
posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Bluebeard's Castle (Herzog Blaubarts Burg)

This was one of those films I thought that I would never get to see. But as with the recently revenant Out 1, I should have had more faith; after years in legal limbo, and thanks to the work of Thelma Schoonmaker-Powell, it has now been restored from a print owned by the producer’s widow. Perhaps after all I will get to see Luna de miel (just this moment found it on YouTube, seven years later..), The Boy Who Turned Yellow (done!), Sweet Hunters, Wet Dreams (done!), Overland Stage Raiders, (done! Boy, was that bad), or anything by Eduardo de Gregorio (done one). And maybe that rough cut of Ambersons will turn up in Brazil..

Bluebeard’s Castle was made in 1964 for West German television. The Archers’ partnership had dissolved in 1957 and Powell had found himself a professional outcast since the Peeping Tom debacle of 1960. Hein Heckroth, costume designer and art director with whom the Archers (and Powell in particular) had collaborated with such glee since 1946, most notably on the 'Dance of the Red Shoes' and Tales Of Hoffmann (1951), was teaching in Germany when he called Powell to sound his interest in directing Bartók’s pair of Bluebeard’s Castle (composed 1911-1917) and The Miraculous Mandarin (1918-1924). They would be one-hour TV specials, as filmed opera and filmed ballet respectively, to be produced by one Norman Foster (not the Welles collaborator), a basso profondo who was also to play Bluebeard. It was right up Powell’s street. He knew neither piece, but with recordings dispatched post haste by Boosey & Hawkes he took only a few bars to decide and, assured that the Technicolor stock would be processed at his preferred Heathrow lab, accepted with delight. Money from the Süddeutsche Rundfunk was already in place, but it was tight; Foster was an independent (and little-experienced) producer, and prior to shooting Powell explored in his beloved Landrover many routes over the Alps from his temporary home in southern France to producers’ meetings in various parts of central Europe. In the end, The Miraculous Mandarin was never made (Powell was less keen on it anyway), and many of the crew were not paid in full for their work on Bluebeard’s Castle, but it turned out to be a joyous experience for all involved, and for Powell “one of the most delightful” of his career.

 Powell’s great enthusiasms was for ‘composed cinema’ – something like ‘total film’ – with camera, actors, lights, décor, words, music, and movement all carefully composed to act in accord to create one great unified artform. It was a practice he had first essayed in the final cliff-top confrontation between sisters Ruth and Clodagh in Black Narcissus (1947), and developed through the two aforementioned Heckroth projects, as well as in their collaborations on Oh Rosalinda!! (1955), the 30-minute Sorceror's Apprentice (1955) ballet, and the unhappy (and Heckroth-less) Luna de miel (1959). His lifelong mantra was “all art is one”, firmly in the camp that cinema is the medium best able to demonstrate this, in its capacity to make use of all other arts and to render their individual and divergent qualities subservient to its own specific essence and achievement (his plans for The Miraculous Mandarin included décor by Matisse, costumes by Picasso, and orchestration by Stravinsky). The ‘composition’ element of this great harmonising of the arts involves staging and filming to a pre-recorded soundtrack, movement by movement, cut by cut, bar by bar. This orchestrating of action to soundtrack prior to editing remains (outside of Bollywood) an uncommon way of working; Fantasia (1940) remains the most obvious example, although in live action (and directly inspired by Powell) Scorsese did it for the “Layla” sequence of Goodfellas (1990), and Welles had done it with the dialogue for his Macbeth back in 1947. Welles used the technique the better to direct the (already stage-run) words, but the result was a strange, restricting effect, giving a dream-like burnish to the film (oddly similar to that of Herzog’s hypnosis technique in Herz aus Glas, 1976).

This is of course a tremendous constraint on the actual process of filming in one sense, with spontaneity almost entirely precluded, but this circumscription also gives the director a heightened measure of control and greater scope to map out the overall composition and effect of the film, to create something where the guiding hand of the artist is apparent in every choice manifested through sound and image. If only for the sake of the actors, it works much better with music and sung words than with straight speech, and in Powell’s version at least, the heightened artificiality can quite carry any potential awkwardness of playing to playback (the least artificial of them, Oh Rosalinda!!, is also the least exhilarating, great fun though it is nonetheless). The further Powell moves away from reality, and the closer he moves to the exaggerated presentation and décor of the theatre, the greater freedom he creates for himself; the camera unrestrained by the proscenium arch, carring us deep into a stylised, theatrical world which, although still bound by the limits of the (sound) stage, is a blank canvas on which the director’s and art director’s imaginations run quite free to creat an emotional landscape untroubled by pesky physical reality. Powell had fired Heckroth’s old boss, Alfred Junge, for daring to say that his ideas for The Red Shoes went too far; the 17-minute ballet sequence starts with the camera on Moira Shearer on a realistic theatre stage, but follows her deep into the fantastical three-dimensional realm of her own dancing psyche that exists at striking odds with the physical reality of the film. It is an extraordinary, avant-garde flourish, and by using the same techniques spread over a whole feature, Tales Of Hoffmann becomes something like a new art-form in itself. With such a concentrated and hermetic assault on the senses, the results can be heady, but the aim, the achievement, and the overall effect on the viewer are extraordinary.

Bluebeard’s Castle, at only a shade over an hour long, is a little jewel, perfectly formed from the meagrest of resources. The soundtrack was recorded with the inexpensive but passionate symphony orchestra of Zagreb, in a small, unfinished studio in Salzburg. Heckroth and his two students made sets and costumes out of anything they could get for cheap and transform with their hands – sculpted polystyrene, gauze, foil, glass, plastic sheeting, and lots of paintings. If the financial restraints sometimes produce touches reminiscent of student theatricals, the result is nonetheless a fantastic and fantastical ever-changing labyrinth of strange forms, backdrops, and colours, endlessly adaptable to the will of Heckroth and Powell. Hints of physicality centre around the (painted) wooden door at the entrance to the castle, portions of stone wall, broad-bladed foil-covered swords, and a wide, low purple-silk-covered bed on which much discussion takes place between Bluebeard and his new wife Judith (Powell was never one to overlook the erotic). For the rest, set divisions are formed with endless invention from abstract sculptures of almost-recognisable forms, ribbons of plastic, painted gauze, and coloured light, or its absence.
Another great money-saver was the fact that the opera has a cast of only two: with superb restraint, Foster’s Bluebeard is a strong, still centre to the film, commanding but never threatening, and conveying at times an almost desperate (and traditionally medieval) melancholy. Around him flits Ana-Raquel Sartre as the emotionally unrestrained Judith, as spirited and self-possessed as any of the Archers’ heroines; Powell described her as ungainly in real life but she is elegant and effectively enchanting here, her poise and look reminiscent of somewhere between Madeleine Stowe and Lisa Marie, and with lustrous Juliet Greco hair. Foster had sung with her on tour, and thought she would be an effective second fiddle to his starring role, but it was obvious to both him and Powell only a couple of days into the shoot that she was unwittingly stealing the film. Her achievements are subtlety and a sense of complete emotional engagement, but there’s no denying the assistance given her by Powell’s never-less-than-adoring camera-eye. The one area of decorative restraint presumably not governed by the budget is the make-up, which for her borders on the (1960s) everyday, and for him is barely more exaggerated than traditional male stage make-up, an effective balance of contrast with the unfettered theatricality all around; whilst the castle and staging may be off in the realm of fantasy, the two protagonists remain recognisably much closer to the real world of human suffering

The 1909 libretto was written (originally in Hungarian) by future film theorist, Béla Bálazs; Bartók’s modernist and broadly symbolist score, more polytonal than atonal, highly controlled and with melodies closer to speech patterns than singing, came three years later. The original Perrault-related folk-tale is altered somewhat through the early twentieth-century mid-European prism of psychology (with psychosexual shading), and rather than one door and seven dead wives, this Bluebeard has seven locked doors and three ex-wives, who in the end will turn out to be alive, after a fashion. The film is introduced by Powell’s wry subtitles over a (charming) painting of the castle in the mountains, informing us that the work will be sung in German (and not to let that put us off!) and briefly introducing the frightening duke and his curious wife. Thereafter, he provides only occasional explanatory subtitles, allowing (for those with no German) the rest of the (emotional) narrative to be carried perfectly effectively by décor and action. The film proper begins with seven mysterious and imposing rune-engraved menhirs representing the seven locked doors, arranged like a graveyard around which the camera ominously creeps and peers, before Bluebeard and Judith enter. She is horrified at his dark, windowless castle, with damp walls that seem to be weeping, and vows to introduce love and light and breezes to the gloom. She demands the keys to the seven locked doors, and although the shadows will indeed yield successively to all colours of light, reflecting in sheets and sparkling points from the foil, glass, and cellophane of the décor, she will not sing so optimistically again.

The first door opens onto Bluebeard’s torture chamber, a horrifically abstract confusion of gleaming and menacing spikes. Judith can smell blood. In traditional stagings of the opera the rooms are colour-coded, but Powell and Heckroth do not adhere to such a straightforward schema, splashing various colours over each of the rooms – a golden light recurs to accompany moments of optimism; purple is used for masculine melancholy and (sexually-charged) disappointment; and a creeping red light intrudes as Judith inevitably discovers blood in each room in turn. Similarly free from such rigid coding, and a further demonstration of Heckroth’s inventiveness, are the changes in costume: he in a leather tabard (and smart blue boots) and paint-bespattered undershirt (reminiscent of the painted bodysuits in Tales of Hoffman) that grow more decorative and adorned as more light floods in through the opened doors, until the tragedy of the final two rooms; she in variations on a gauzy cape and skirted leotard, though at one point wearing a large bed sheet with discretely tailored décolletage and, later, a longer dress festooned with strips of black plastic ribonning, almost as though in mourning.

The second door opens onto the armoury – another shock of violence for Judith, and more blood. The broad foil-covered swords, as with the black plastic strips of her dress which look unfortunately like shredded bin bags, would presumably have been upgraded on a larger budget. In the event, however, these amateurish notes are an endearing symbol of the willingness and enthusiasm of the company as a whole (Powell described it as “the most heavenly experience”: they were all professionals, yet behaving as complete amateurs – as artists). Behind the third door is the treasury, no less dark a room than the preceding, but sparkling with the shimmering reflected light of jewels and precious metals, again rendered more figuratively than literally, in the centre of which Judith finds a spindly, ill-looking crown. On this too she finds blood, as she does on the flowers behind the fourth door, in Bluebeard’s garden. This is the first substantial burst of light, colour, and movement in the décor: before Judith leaves the garden, coloured cellophane petals and leaves will fall in the death-auguring autumn wind – and although two giant sunflowers are recognisable overlooking the scene, they are painted with a twisted hideousness as though being pulled in two directions, with the rest of the garden again suggested by a disturbing abstraction of form and colour.

The fifth door opens onto what is described in the libretto as a balcony, overlooking Bluebeard’s lands, but it is slyly described in the subtitle as revealing both Bluebeard’s lands and castle. It is the first impossible door, seamlessly plucking Judith (and us) from the already-fragile interior geography of the film into a strange new and non-physical space. The depth of a rolling vista is certainly suggested, in the hanging layers of gauze painted with hints of hills and landscape, but the result is a disorienting loss of perspective, as though looking inwards rather than outwards. It is in fact a landscape of the soul, capped by blood-stained clouds. All of these doors, we realise now, open onto the kingdom of Bluebeard’s soul, in each part of which there is blood or tragedy. He himself will shortly become a literal part of the castle as his giant face appears suddenly projected into the darkness above an imploring and lamenting Judith, his person as part of the décor.

The prominent bed returns as the scene of discussion over the last two keys. Compared with its earlier appearance, we can now see Bluebeard as a man of deep melancholy and terrible secrets, rather than as the rumoured ogre; and Judith’s earlier voluptuousness has all but vanished, replaced by a fear more terrible for its vagueness, her demands for the last two keys driven no longer by blithe curiosity, but by a horrible compulsion. Bluebeard redoubles his efforts to resist her, desperate to shut off from her the deepest parts of his soul, for fear of losing her. Again, however, gives in to her insistence and pleading that there be no locked doors (explicitly, no secrets). Behind the sixth door is his ‘Lake of Tears’, magically realised by Heckroth with shining foreground teardrops descending before an endless lake of deep unending sorrow; the apparently outward progression towards light and space revealed unequivocally as its opposite, as the physical world gives way entirely to the inward world of emotion. Judith presumes the tears to be those of the previous wives, rumoured to have been murdered, but the tears are Bluebeard’s, his sorrow mingled eerily with blood, as red powder drips into the dark mirror-like lake, and Judith guesses only half-correctly what she will find behind the seventh door. The wives are indeed there, but as three ghastly structures, robed and almost human in form, topped with the faces of three women, their eyes closed. The libretto is specific that they are still “living, breathing”, but what we see is a horrible stasis, their blood soaked through every room of the castle, saturating Bluebeard's conscience. They are fixed in a symbolic colour code – red, gold and blue: the first he met at dawn, thus she now represents all dawns for him; the second he met at noon; and the third he met in the evening. Judith, the most beautiful of them all, is to represent the night-time, and this appalling realisation slowly dawns on her as Bluebeard fetches the misshapen crown, places it upon her, and closes the door behind him, forever. He declares that there is nothing for him now but eternal night, and the close-up of his face that ends the film is gradually obliterated by a delirious criss-crossing of purple lines, merging him finally and permanently with the production design, the “physical” castle.

Bluebeard has completed his ghastly collection. He cannot be fulfilled by one woman alone, nor by any truly living, breathing woman, and that is the source of his sorrow. But there is no hatred for the wives – on the contrary, he worships and cherishes them, and bestows upon them all his treasures, but he is so overwhelmed by their beauty that he must pin them like butterflies in his memory, lock them away in his soul, to be preserved in a moment of perfection (before that beauty passes). If this shoe-horning of 20-century psychology onto a medieval tale feels awkward at times, the libretto is at least open-ended enough to allow for a spectrum of meaning to be implied rather than directly specified, hovering between symbolism and surrealism right up to the troubling presentation of the final room and its mysterious contents, and it remains true to the form of the fairy-tale whereby the actual tale and its telling are at least as important as its point and meaning.

 This fascination with preserving the image of (perfect) womanhood in a state outside of life and death had already manifested itself via Deborah Kerr’s three characters in the Archers’ The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp (1943), and most explicitly through Mark’s films in Peeping Tom. Bálazs prefigures the latter’s obsessional gaze (also a fertile area in his later film theory), and asks us likewise to consider the madman’s tortured psyche. Faced with repeated pleas from the object of his love, the love whose caresses he had hoped would divert him from this (self-)destructive course, Bluebeard is powerless to resist. His tragedy lies in the clear-eyed self-knowledge with which he must submit to these deep-seated and (symbolically) murderous desires, over which he has no control: exactly like Mark, except that Bluebeard lacks even that last redeeming sliver of humanity that would allow him to sacrifice himself in place of his love. It was a particularly happy chance that this should have been the opera offered to Powell; even closer alignment is revealed by the libretto's traditional Prologue, replaced by Powell's introductory subtitles, and often omitted in any case, who speaks of the “fringed curtain of the eyelid” – both that of the audience, looking out, and his own, the window to the soul – and asks whether the stage on which the story unfolds is “inside” or “outside”. It is for the audience to decide whether this story takes place on the stage (screen), in the mind of the story-teller, in the mind of the protagonist, or in the mind of the audience itself. In the best tradition of metaphorical narrative, it can of course be all four at once. Powell had been taking his camera inside the mind long before Peeping Tom (Niven’s fringed curtain of an eyelid in A Matter Of Life And Death, 1947), and a narrative realm that exists simultaneously on the physical and emotional planes was the perfect platform for the fantasist, the magician, to put his composed and total cinema to its most fitting use, marshaling all these forces to forge a connection between artist and audience more elemental than the music, words, and images on their own would allow, via the elevated and elusive emotional sphere: an escape from (corpo)reality that contrives as pure an expression as possible of the human compulsion to fundamental communion between soul and soul, where all art begins, and is received, as one. 

d Michael Powell p Norman Foster lib Béla Bálazs ph Hannes Staudinger ed Paula Dvorak pd Hein Heckroth m Béla Bartók cast Norman Foster, Ana Raquel Sartre
(1964, WGer[TV], 62m)
posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Friday, February 8, 2008

J’ai vu tuer Ben Barka (I Saw Ben Barka Get Killed)

A fine conspiracy thriller, taking its cue from the 1969 (Mehdi) Ben Barka affair, ever a sore subject in France and with obvious contemporary resonance: Barka was a militant Moroccan politician with unusual power on the international diplomatic stage, expected to unite an increasingly dissatisfied – and independence-minded – third world. Although suspicion fell squarely on French government agencies, no satisfactory solution was ever forthcoming to his permanent disappearance in October 1969. A partially fictionalised account, therefore, Péron and Smihi's film keeps the audience in the same uneasy state of ignorance as to what exact forces are at work and in what directions. Narrated by the corpse of small-time hood, PR man and budding film producer Georges Figon (Berling), it focuses on four protagonists at one remove from the main conspirators: Figon and his girlfriend, and Marguerite Duras and Georges Franju, with whom Figon is planning a film. As the last two suggest (along with the narrative conceit), there is a fundamental cinephilia at work, channeled through Balasko and the talismanic presence of Léaud, as well as the cool gangster moves (unslavishly) evocative of Melville, accompanied by the appropriate hats, coats and cars, jazz and sunglasses, and the tough underbelly of 1960s cinema-Paris. Meetings with various shadowy figures, and his perpetual compulsion to make a quick buck, lead Figon into a far deeper conspiracy than he imagined: with further clandestine telephone calls he’s setting Barka up for a fatal encounter with the French police. The prize at stake is nothing less than global decolonialisation on the one hand, or the preservation of the western capitalist hegemony on the other: Barka is more than once referred to as anti-American and the otherwise tight script is a little heavy-handed in its modern parallels, the dialogue occasionally clunky and dogmatic. Wider implications aside however, the focus is mainly on the foot soldiers of the conspiracy, excellently cast like a mob of 40s gangsters, and as Figon becomes more peripheral to their overall plan, our information as to what is afoot behind the scenes becomes as restricted as his, reinforcing the sense of his mounting confusion and (not ill-founded) paranoia. Berling’s strength in the role is to present a singularly banal exterior – by his own admission, that of a country notary – and to convince immediately as the venal and self-serving reform-school boy who has spent his whole life on the make. Perpetually uptight, he carries the film so well that even at his most weasely, our sympathy is never lost; we already know he’ll get his comeuppance, and although he brings it upon himself through an incessant playing of both ends against the middle and an ill-advised if lucrative chat with the press – “j’ai vu tuer Ben Barka” – he is the little guy crushed by the all-powerful and unknowable machine of global political skulduggery. The playing is neatly effective throughout – Balasko’s Duras in particular – appropriate to the seamless blending of fiction with fact, while the documentary elements that bookend the film keep in mind that, even as we listen to the voiceover of a corpse, what we are watching is at least extrapolated from real events – the incident retains the sinister aura of mystery and international conspiracy that surrounds it in real life, a reminder that the political problems addressed by Barka and perpetuated by his abduction, remain still largely unresolved today.

d Serge Le Péron, Saïd Smihi p Gilles Sandoz, Paco Poch, Saïd Smihi sc Serge le Péron, Saïd Smihi, Frédéric Moreau ph Christophe Pollock ed Janic Jones ad Patrick Durand m Joan Albert Amargós, Pierre-Alexandre Mati cast Charles Berling, Simon Abkarian, Josiane Balasko, Jean-Pierre Léaud, Fabienne Babe, Mathieu Amalric, Azize Kabouche
(2005, Fr, 101m)
posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Thursday, February 7, 2008

Angst vor der Angst (Fear of Fear)

Margot Staudte is a pregnant middle-class mother and housewife and she is going insane. She’s not sure why, but she’s terrified of losing her grip on the real world. Initially she clings to her daughter’s companionship for comfort, desperate when she makes to leave the apartment to go upstairs and see grandma, but at other times Margot is barely aware of her existence, and experiences with detachment the arrival of the new baby. Her hateful mother-in-law knows how to play the role of mother and housewife well, and is scornful of her abilities, while her sister-in-law contemptuously does her grocery shopping; her husband is a harmless dope, assuming without glaring signs to the contrary that she is happy and too absorbed in his upcoming exams to pay attention, and the doctor merely wants to seduce her. As the last puts it, she’s an attractive, healthy young woman, so why should she feel like she is going insane? The source of her fear is that she cannot answer that question herself, but she knows it’s to do with a fatal disconnection with the world around her, a fearful failure to understand it, and a fathomless inability to find meaning in the everyday (cf most other Fassbinder characters in one way or another). She dulls the pain with cognac and valium and starts a desultory affair with the doctor as some sort of action, something to do. The only person who tries to care – touchingly – is her brother-in-law upstairs, but he is helpless in his inability to understand her, and by that time she’s too far gone to notice this one expression of sympathy; she has already cut her wrist semi-accidentally, desperate in order to feel something, to take her mind off the fear.

As the title suggests, this fear of the world, fear of looking in the mirror, fear of insanity, is self-perpetuating. It is a very ordinary madness, born from a very ordinary and orderly existence, and born from an inability to find meaning in that order and to understand it. The extra-sensitivity that has revealed to her the emptiness of her domestic and social roles is the same that feeds her fear of going insane, of not being normal; she is unable to ask, as her sister-in-law does (fantastically steel-eyed Irm Hermann, her own face redolent of an abnormal, twisted psychology) “who’s normal?”. Certainly not Mr Bauer, the man not-right-in-the-head who lives across the street. With Kurt Raab’s red-rimmed eyes (and memories of Herr R, a close brother in this sort of inarticulate madness of frustration) he is a ghastly and sorrowful sight from whom Margot hides her daughter. But he’s the only one with understanding of her – he tells her so and we believe him – and her fear of him is a combination of recognition and denial of herself.

This is an (almost) dispassionate case study presented in vignettes, the narrative progressing only through the gradual disintegration of the heroine’s mind. But it is presented in such circumscribed and stock surroundings as to make it clear that her case need not be unique; she is a close relative of Gena Rowlands’s Myrtle under the influence, Deneuve’s Carole and Belle de Jour, Seyrig/Ackerman’s Jeanne Dielman, Julianne Moore’s Carol White and others, tormented by the opaque and pervasive ennui of elision specific to the middle-class housewife, and in Fassbinder shares with Herr R, Nora Helmer (via Ibsen) and plenty of others (not least the ever-present shade of Biberkopf), that claustrophobic feeling of entrapment, confounded by an inability to make sense of and fit comfortably into an apparently ordered world. She is also an eerily subdued partner to Martha (whose insanity is presented and part-externalised through the melodrama of masochism – here Margot is effectively Gaslight­-ing herself), both roles taken by the stick-insect-like Margit Carstensen, with her clear-skinned toothy death’s-head, a perfect angular, awkward beauty to embody such a brittle emotional state so awkwardly unhinged. Both films too are amongst Fassbinder’s “women’s pictures” and in the best tradition of classical Hollywood he uses an ascending-descending woodwind motif to take us inside Margot’s madness, and undulating waves of focus for her point of view – it could almost be a Joan Crawford picture. But he also steps back to observe as Margot is watched repeatedly from windows and across the street, in the swimming pool and the psychiatrist’s waiting room (the sign on the door ominously emphasised: “praxis”. Practice at the customs of living is precisely what she needs). She is a specimen, constantly watched and constantly under judgment. Everyone but her husband, who scarcely looks at her, has formed a judgment, decided what she is, be it a madwoman, a fool who cannot step up to the demands of mother/wife-hood or simply a beautiful physical body (appropriate it should be the physician who holds this view). Part of her problem is an inability to make such a judgment herself but also, one senses, an inarticulate knowledge that to do so would be to accede to bad faith; her fear stems not only from incomprehension of the outside world but also from the unknowableness of self, deeper than simple incomprehension of what she is currently experiencing. In the end it is Margot who looks down from a window, but her gaze is entirely without judgment, without feeling, almost without understanding. She has been fully anaesthetised, prescription drugs severing all connection with the exterior world. Her inability to make sense of it remains but now the waves of focus are less a distortion of her view of reality than a barrier to it. The isolation brought on by her fear of the world still cripples her, but she can no longer feel it; the fear of insanity has been suppressed. In no sense has she gotten well. And this blind unknowing acceptance is made all the more devastating as what she sees from the window is her own likely fate.

d/sc Rainer Werner Fassbinder p Peter Märthesheimer ph Jürgen Jürges ed Liesgret Schmitt-Klink ad Kurt Raab m Peer Raben cast Margit Carstensen, Ulrich Faulhaber, Brigitte Mira, Irm Hermann, Armin Meier, Adrian Hoven, Kurt Raab, Ingrid Caven, Constanze Haas
(1975, WGer[TV], 88m)

posted by tom newth at 0 Comments

Tweet This ! (Click On It For Url Shortening) Share On Facebook ! Share On Google Buzz ! Add To Del.icio.us ! Share On Digg ! Share On Reddit ! Share On LinkedIn ! Post To Blogger ! Share On StumbleUpon ! Share On Friend Feed ! Share On MySpace ! Share On Yahoo Buzz ! Share On Google Reader ! Google Bookmark !

Newer›  ‹Older